Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

h1

Thanks for stopping by!

March 8, 2011

As you can tell, it has been quite awhile since I’ve posted anything.  Life has a way of getting…well…in the way!  I had a long-term relationship end and a move to Denver to keep me busy for the past year.  But now I’m going to start writing again and hopefully have a surprise or two to announce.

If you’re visiting here for the first time, browse through some of my writing and welcome!   If you’re one of my six readers who are back, thanks for hanging in there.  Either way, don’t be shy, tell me how you feel!

-J

h1

Make mine a double

September 16, 2009
Ive got condoms

"I've got condoms"

What do Moe Szyslak, Sam Malone, Isaac Washington and I have in common?

Well, besides the fact that chicks (and more importantly Skepchicks) dig us, we’re the guy all the cool kids want to whip up their favorite libation.  At least that’s the case after today’s “Get to know your Skepchick” post on Skepchick.org.

Atlanta’s very own, very spicy (Grr!) MasalaSkeptic was interviewed by the swami of wearable art SurlyAmy.  Apparently these two shared a suite (Sweet!) at Dragon*Con over Labor Day weekend.  In her quest Amy, aka “The Scientist of Ceramics” took some red-hot snapshots to find out just what makes her fellow Skepchick tick.

Oh, there was a Q & A too.  That’s where I come in.  In question four:

Amy: When we live on our own private Skepchick island, who would you recommend for the bartender position?

Maria: Atlanta Skeptic Joe Anderson (www.thebiot.com) who makes the best margarita I’ve ever tasted and has been known to make Special Skepchick Booze Runs in emergencies. Joe always comes through.

The funny thing is, the margarita isn’t even one of the best drinks that I make.  (For one of those libations, we’ll have to wait for a certain other Skepchick to…eh hem….post the official results of this contest.  Love you E!)

But seriously, being a Skepchick is hard work.  I’m just glad that each week, with the help of a few washed-up guest stars, I’m able to help people find love….No, wait…I’m happy to help the “Love won’t hurt anymore ” Doc get in a program for his sexual addiction…No…I’m still in denial that we had a U.S. Congressman named Gopher

Forget it.  You know what I mean.

Just click here and sing along.

h1

The disaster that saved lives

March 27, 2009

Captain Jacob van Zanten was the epitome of an airline pilot.  He dressed sharply; his experience and respect positioned him as an instructor for pilots new to the Boeing 747, while his charm and good looks made him a natural choice to be featured in much of his company’s PR material and to be its de facto spokesperson.  In both the public’s eye and in the cockpit he was viewed as a God.

And that is precisely what caused the single worst aviation disaster in history.

On March 27th, 1977 Captain van Zanten crashed his KLM Airlines 747 into a Pan Am 747 on takeoff, killing 583 passengers and crew.  Though bad weather, bad judgment and even an act of terrorism contributed to the two jumbo jets being on a collision course that Sunday evening, the disaster’s ultimate cause lay in the way an airline captain’s authority was considered unquestionable and inerrant.

His was not simply the last word, it was the only word.

As airlines grew, so did their need for pilots.  Following World War II, there were thousands of trained young men ready to fill those positions created by the growing economy and its demand for fast travel around the country and the world.  It was only natural then, when the military’s culture of discipline and absolute adherence to the chain of command became the accepted norm.

While the unique demands of combat may require a strict, unquestioning reliance on such a system, it proved not to be the best fit for safe public transportation.  In war, there are times when a mission must be undertaken to ultimately save a few or even many thousands of lives.  In commercial aviation however, safety must be the primary consideration.  Flying people on vacation to Disneyworld or business travelers to Cincinnati is not obligatory.  There’s a saying that sums it up nicely:

Takeoffs are optional.  Landings aren’t.

But this lesson hadn’t been learned yet.  Captain van Zanten ultimately ignored the objections of his crew at Tenerife.  There was confusion over whether or not the tower had said they could take off yet.  The men working there had been using non-standard phrases and spoke poor English – the international standard for all aviation communication.

The small airport was pushed to the limit.  They simply were not equipped to handle the dozen or so large aircraft (carrying hundreds of passengers each) that were on the ground.  The planes were diverted to Tenerife after one bomb exploded and threats of another closed their destination, Las Palmas.  All day long, the jumbo jets sat on the ground, waiting at a facility that was neither equipped to handle them, nor their hundreds of passengers.

Once Las Palmas re-opened, fog and lack of space for taxing and takeoff meant there was a lot of radio chatter as controllers tried to get the delayed planes back into the air.  Since the airport wasn’t designed to handle so many large aircraft at the same time, it required more than one to be on the runway at the same time.

When the KLM flight reached the approach end of runway 30 (pronounced “three zero”) it turned around and waited for word from the tower that it could take off.

At this point the Pan Am 747 was still taxiing on the runway towards the other plane.

In the KLM cockpit, Captain van Zanten was watching the clock.  His crew was approaching the end of their legally mandated duty times and would not be able to continue past them.  He knew that if the flight did not leave soon, it would not leave at all.

Then controllers radioed an instruction for Pan Am to make a turn off the runway that didn’t make sense.  It would bring them back to the terminal instead of towards the end of the runway.  Several calls were made back and forth between the cockpit and the tower to clarify what exactly, the Pan Am crew were supposed to do.  The were told to take the next exit off of the runway.

Confusion ensued.

Hearing that the other 747 was supposed to clear the runway, but without an explicit clearance to take off, Captain van Zanten announced to his crew that he was taking off.  The First Officer (FO) spoke up, saying that they had not been cleared yet.  The obviously miffed and possibly embarrased van Zanten grudgingly brought the four hundred ton plane to a stop.

Communication between the tower and the Pan Am jet continued, as its crew tried to understand what the controllers wanted them to do.

Now Van Zanten had his FO query the tower for their take off clearance.  The tower repeated the aircraft’s instructions on what to do after departure, but didn’t issue a take off clearnce.   Inexplicably, the veteran pilot with over eleven thousand hours flight experience advanced the four thrust levers on the 747 and doomed the lives of almost six hundred people.  This time the FO said nothing.

In the Pan Am cockpit, the crew was unaware that KLM was accelerating towards them.  They were still trying to make sense of what the tower had told them.

There was however, still a chance to avoid the disaster.  The Flight Engineer (FE) had been listening to the radio and asked aloud if the other plane was clear of the runway.  Both van Zanten and the FO (now following the lead of his superior) responded “He’s clear”.  The FE stopped his objection.  He had no reason to question the two senior crew members.

The final moments of the flight are well described in this article:

The last recorded words from the crew of KLM was a familiar epithet to those who regularly hear cockpit voice recorder tapes. More than one pilot had uttered the same phrase when confronted with the possibly irreversible reality of impending disaster.  Captain van Zanten said simply:

“Oh, shit!”

The planes crashed.  Hundreds of people perished.

Though it would be easy to blame both crewmen in the cockpit for failing to continue their objections, it simply was not possible for them to do so.  It was not part of the culture.

This fact did not go unnoticed by the industry.  Reliance upon one person to make critical decisions has been replaced by a collaborative effort called Crew Resource Management or CRM.  A system where all members of the crew are utilized in decision making is now the standard for multi-pilot aircraft.  From day one, commercial pilots are taught the advantage of utilizing all of the resources available to them, to include fellow pilots, crewmembers, air traffic controller and even passengers.  While the captain does have the final decision in many, but not all matters, pre-employment screening weeds out those who are unable to work as a team.  Both initial training and continuing education emphasize reliance upon and the cultivation of a cooperative environment in the cockpit and cabin.

Alongside continued technological advances these changes in the way a Captain interacts with fellow pilots have proven successful.  Airlines have seen tremendous growth in safety due to reduction of not only human error, but in the ability of a crew to respond to rare, but inevitable mechanical failures.  The outcomes of the accidents at Sioux Falls and the Hudson river would not have been possible if it were not for their Captains’ involvement of the entire crew in dealing with the emergency.

In no small way, those lives that were lost on Tenerife thirty two years ago have directly led to the safe air travel we enjoy today.  To learn from their tragedy is to honor them.

List of passengers on Pan Am 1736

List of passengers on KLM 4805

h1

The Sky is Falling!

February 27, 2009

“Beware the fallacies into which undisciplined thinkers most easily fall–they are the real distorting prisms of human nature.”

Francis Bacon


Recently, CNN decided to cut their science department.  Apparently they got rid of their sound argument and research departments as well.  They seem much more interested in presenting shocking, often misleading details than in providing fact or sound reason.  Speculation about the cause of an accident is certainly common, but for a news network to do so live, on-air while the fires still burn (as in the Buffalo crash) is irresponsible and approaches blatant yellow journalism.

The reality is that more people will watch a story about a plane crash, than one that points out how and why aviation is safer than driving.  For an example, look no further than this article.  Though in the beginning it is written to sound like the focus is on the good news / bad news that yes, there have been some crashes recently, but the crashes are survivable, they just don’t do a good job of explaining why They cite fewer casualties, specifically the “Miracle on The Hudson” USAir (Cactus) flight 1549 and the Turkish Airline crash in a muddy field near Amsterdam as evidence in itself.  Again, why?  Though they really attempt to provide no direct argument as to why 1549’s unscheduled swim produced no fatalities, the reason for so few deaths in Amsterdam is found in the sharp observation that “the impact had been severe but it could have been survivable because of the lack of fire.”

As My Somewhat Personal Acquaintance Phil PlaitTM would probably say, “DUH!”

(Note: The phrase My Somewhat Personal Acquaintance Phil PlaitTM in no way borrows from, makes use of or infringes upon My Somewhat Personal Acquaintance Phil PlaitTM‘s adage for Mythbuster Adam Savage)

The pictures from Amsterdam show a plane in a muddy field broken into at least three pieces – severe damage by any definition.  It is possible that the fuel tanks remained intact, but unlikely.  So why was there no fire?  There are several reports that fuel starvation is to blame.  The FAA has put higher flammability standards in place, but they wouldn’t be a factor in this case.  No fuel, means no fire. unconfirmed

Duh.

Update: Now it sounds as if  this crash was a result of the pilots failing to add power once they had leveled off.  It is normal and in fact very efficient (and safe) to reduce power on the engines to idle when descending.  The aircraft essentially glides to a lower altitude (converting gravitational potential energy into lift in the process).  Normally, once the plane levels off, power is added to maintain speed and altitude.


So what were the factors contributing to this “Miracle in The Mud”?  CNN doesn’t help much here as they don’t really point out the most likely reason.  For that, you have to dig just a little.  There is a link to a video where it appears that moments after the crash an expert was hastily summoned for discussion.  He points out what probably saved lives in this crash – stronger seats.  In 2002 the FAA mandated stronger flooring, rails and seats capable of withstanding 16g’s.  The prior standard was 9g’s.  Though the rule does not require retrofit of existing aircraft and only applies to ones built after October of 2009, many manufacturers have voluntarily put the stronger seats in place on new planes in anticipation of the rule.  Considering the photographic evidence of just how badly this plane in Amsterdam was damaged, it seems to be a no-brainer to say that stronger seats at least played a role in saving lives.  Though a reference is made to this fact in the last sentence, it is too bad this wasn’t  included in or explored in the main body of the article.  Instead, they made sure to include such useful details like the fact that the Turkish Airlines logo was “split in two”.  Crucial information.

But what about “The Miracle in the Hudson”?

As long as sensational reports such as the aircraft “hitting the water at 150 MPH” confuse how fast the plane was moving through the air with how fast it contacted the water (less than 5 MPH) it is no wonder people think supernatural intervention was required.  In fact, reports from the pilots and the flight attendants indicate that other than where they landed, it wasn’t that rough.  An off-duty pilot on board described it as “no worse than [an aircraft] carrier landing” – certainly much, much less than 9g’s, the old standard for seats.  This was a controlled, though zero-thrust landing that just happened to be in the water.

Look, even though they are exceedingly rare, airline accidents have been on our collective mind lately.  In the past 6 weeks at least four high profile incidents have been all over the news.  Newspapers (does anyone still read the newspaper for news?), CNN and now even twitter give us shocking images of twisted, broken machines lying on the ground (Cue James Taylor).  After watching such reports, I can’t blame anyone for being a little apprehensive about getting on an airplane.  I’m not going to try and change your mind.

I can’t.

You’re either going to fly or you’re not.  But that’s another issue.  Just remember, disproportional news coverage of aviation accidents that focus on the sensational aspects leave out one very important thing:

Airline accidents don’t happen very often.

h1

“A Place for your stuff” – a quickie

February 10, 2009

One of my favorite George Carlin bits is the one where he talks about his “stuff” (For those of you who haven’t heard it, watch this.  NSFW, BTW. For language).

Well, just like George, I’m always looking for a place to put my stuff, in this case – skeptical podcasts.  For a few years now, I’ve kept an html file with the ones I listen to saved on my desktop.  Hi-tech, I know.  Since I haven’t graduated to the level of uber-geek that many of you have (using iTunes), I just used this page to organize my downloads.  I even made it my start page for awhile.

This weekend I attended the first ever Atlanta Skepticamp.  It was an evening and a day of local skeptics giving talks on subjects ranging from Theater Superstitions to Neural Plasticity.  I was impressed not only with how diverse a group of presenters we had, but how ridiculously smart the audience was.  Our local folks are awesome!

Beat that Colorado!

Friday evening there was a joint podcast with Derek and Swoopy from Skepticality and John and David from American Freethought.   At one point, Swoopy commented that she was surprised no one had created a directory of skeptical podcasts.  72 hours later, here it is:

Skeptcast.com

Yes it is plain and ugly (sorry Phlebas).  Yes I did it in a blog generator (WordPress).  Let’s face it, the design isn’t going to win any webbies (or “A” webby, for that matter).

But that’s not why I created it.  I did that because: 1.) I’ve been extremely lazy about updating this blog and felt a little guilty when all these people at skepticamp were doing so much for skepticism; 2.) I suck at design.  I (use to) write code for a living, not make things pretty and finally 3.) I’m cheap.  WordPress hosts it for free.

For now, I really want to limit the site to just skeptical podcasts, at least on the main page.  That might evolve over time, though.  If you have suggestions for podcasts for me to include (or remove) please do so here.

For now, well I gotta go finish season one of Battlestar Galactia.

-J

h1

What an Arse!

August 22, 2008

Of late, banter with my friend The Skepbitch – the Cunning Linguist herself – has revolved around an obsessive-compulsive behavior of mine.  Though I’m straying into new territory by revealing myself, here goes:

For some odd reason I have this awful affinity for alliteration.  As in Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.

Some people step over cracks, I repeat first consonant sounds in phrases.

(See, I knew this blog would somehow be cathartic and therefore much cheaper than counseling!)

Today she posted a funny-assed article about the meaning of the phrase Half-Assed. Please read it, but remember – she’s really smart.  And has a PhD in LINGUISTICS. So don’t feel bad if, like me, you have to use wikipedia to be sure of the meaning of some of the words.  No complaints here, though.  I like when a woman teaches me new words.  Brings me back to first grade and Mrs. Teal.

Ahh…Mrs. Teal, with her beautiful bee-hive bouffant …err..coiffe.

Wait, back to Karen –  I’m really not sure which impresses me more: the fact that she knows so many eloquent-ass phrases or that she knows so many eloquent ass-phrases.

Anyway, I couldn’t resist an alliterative admiration addendum (see what I mean?). I had to leave a comment.

Alas, I’m such a jerk.

h1

Hello, world indeed!

August 18, 2008

daunt·ing [ dáwnting ]

disheartening: likely to discourage, intimidate, or frighten somebody

That pretty much sums up how I feel at the moment.  As in creating this blog is daunting.  I’m staring at an empty page with no idea what to write, uncertain if I can summon up the ideas, let alone the wordsmithing required to place them down on…uhh…my keyboard.

Hmmmm…

Still staring back at me. It’s not gonna go away.

I read a great comment by Wil Wheaton on his blog that essentially said “Just start writing!” and fix it later.  His point being that it is much easier to fix problems on a full page than it is to fill up a blank page.  But Wil, what if my whole page turns out to be crap?  What if I turn out pages of crap?  Ahh. There goes that nasty fear, that intimidation, that daunting-ness.  Hearing Dr G say “you’re writing in passive voice”!

But what is fear?  In this case, I guess it would be that I get horrible comments criticizing my writing, my style or my facts.  Worse yet, what if no one even reads this?  Ok, ok, I have a little writer’s anxiety.  So where do these fears come from?

The unknown.

I’ve never written for an audience before, so I have no idea what to expect.  A bit of fear is natural, I suppose.  That’s kinda of why I wanted to write to begin with – to take away people’s fear.  Provide people with facts and hopefully they won’t be afraid.  But providing information alone isn’t enough.  Each of us should carry around with us what the late Carl Sagan called a “baloney detection kit“.   What does it mean?  I’m not going to begin a discussion on critical thinking, partly because it is late, but mostly because there are lots of good sources on it.

Am I being naive?  Probably.  Can I make a difference?  I hope so.  Look, I have no idea where this is going to lead except hopefully, to the truth.  At least the truth as we can know it.  Whether it be print media, television, radio, the internet or even <shudder> at school, the public is fed a lot of wrong information.  Information on everything from global warming to stem cell research.  From alternative energy to alternative medicine.

Knowing what to listen to and more importantly HOW to listen certainly can be a daunting task.

Thanks for reading TheBIOT.

Joe